I just read Camille's response and I can not help to think that her and I were thinking very similarity as we were reading the book. Before this weeks reading selection, I had constantly wrote in my blog posts that I constantly had to reread selections because they seemed obscure and very unrealistic. However, after reading Camille's post, I realized that this past week I did not find myself doing this. I think this occurred due to the lessons that we learned in class this week. When something weird came up in a passage this week, I just thought to myself "does this relate to one of the three pillars?" A great majority of the time, it did and I was able to understand the reading passage.
One thing that Camille pointed out that really caught my attention was the fact that they make it seem as the government fixes every case that goes into the court so they win. This shows that the pillar of "state" is controlling them. What is the point of following the rules that a group of individuals make if they can just accuse you and convict you if you are not actually guilty? There is no point in actually following the rules if you live in a society that is similar to K.'s.
No comments:
Post a Comment