In his novel The Trial, Franz Kafka criticizes
societal institutions made by mankind’s destructive logic that ensure citizen
confinement and lead to the inevitable failure of human values and beliefs.
These institutions digress citizens’ attention from life’s chaos and
uncertainty highlighted by the court system.
I. The different roles in society, their knowledge
of and influence in the court system
a.
The inspector
i. Pg.
14 “Think less about us and what’s going to happen to you, and instead think
more about yourself.”
ii. By
saying that you are blatantly innocent, it makes you seem guilty
iii. Directly
follows his duty of arresting K and noting his reaction, tells him that his
ordinary life should not be disrupted. Knows everything about K’s life
including his profession and love life
b.
The court usher
i. Physical
pg. 66 “the court usher’s civilian jacket, which, in addition to the norml buttons,
bore as sole emblem of the office two gold buttons, which seemed to have been
taken off an old officer’s uniform”- the illegitimacy of the court system
ii. Talks
to K about his wife having an affair with all of other men who belong to the
court system, “you’re a defendant after all”- all of the risks you take will
have no effect on the outcome of your trial
iii. Brought
K to the law court offices- K’s perspective of the court system pg. 68
c.
Titorelli the painter
i. Paints
portraits of officials in the court system, gossips about the court system but
acts like a beggar when he tries to sell his artwork
ii. The
manufacturer- “A person is naturally reluctant to allow himself to be advised
by a fellow like that.”- may provide some information and insight about the
judges
d.
Block the Merchant
i. When
he is asked about his past with the lawyer- “I’ll confide in part, but you have
to tell me a secret too, so that we both have something to hold over the other
with regard to the lawyer” pg. 173
ii. Has
5 other lawyers because doesn’t want to overlook anything, spent everything on
his trial (include his personal and career life)- gives K information about
working with the court directly pg. 174
II. The confinement of following superstitions and
traditions
a.
The reliance on lawyers
i. Need
them in order to win the case, as they should know everything about bypassing
all decisions
ii. Pg.
173 “The mind can’t deal with, people are simply too tired and distracted, and
by way of compensation they resort to superstition”- the effect of the court on
people involved with it
iii. Different
superstitions found in the court and how irrelent and inconsequential they are.
They are something to believe in pg. 174
b.
Pursuit of success and a final evident
conclusion
i. K
tries so hard to win his case that he misses a lot going on in his personal
life and overlooks other outlets to escape from
ii. Titorelli
gives him choices for his case but neither has a definitive conclusion. His
trial will continue for the rest of his life. Leaves K. wanting more and making
worse decisions
III. Cathedral’s allegory
a.
Why we believe the things that we don’t see
b.
The parable is about a man who is desperately
trying to gain permission to enter a door and he dies before his wish is
granted.
c.
Setting and characters are allusive- not all
identical with our reality, dream-like and nonsensical, characters don’t have
human characteristics and are translated to motives
i. Man
from countryside is a persistent desire
ii. Doorkeeper
is an obstacle to the idtentity of a hidden Law that neither of them knows
d.
K’s personal experience-
i. the man from the country side is waiting for
permission from the doorkeeper like the man who is looking for freedom but
always seem to block himself from it
ii. a man desiring an absolute ideal that doesn’t
exist in reality
iii. K
has never achieved the sense of isolation from the judicial system, there is no
exit once you enter the system and there is no way to avoid the system
iv. It
is an absolute that engulfs everyone even though we cant feel, perceive or know
it.
IV. The difference between K’s personality before he
was arrested and before he was killed- both highlights the weaknesses of the bureaucracy
created by humans
a.
Before his arrest
i. Pg.
13- Aware of life’s unanticipated distractions and hardships “…had to make your
way on your own you get hardened to surprises and don’t take them too
seriously”
ii. Thinks
the arrest isn’t important- since he can’t think of an offense of which he
would be accused then he is rightfully innocent (misconception of human
institutions)
iii. Personality-
pg. 14- has a whole list of questions to figure out about his arrest, all logic
based on observations and reasoning
iv. Men
are rugged and poor individuals
b.
After his arrest
i. Men
are formal and of a higher society in order to show that the role an individual
holds in society is irrelevant to his vulnerability to hidden and oppressive
institutions
ii. “So
one of the men asked the other to let him work on positioning K on his own for
a while, but that didn’t improve things either. Finally they left K in a
position that wasn’t even the best of those they had already tried” – have lost
all sense of their natural intelligence and consciousness, and when they come
across issues that were not outlined in their directions they find themselves hesitant
about what to do
iii. “Logis
is no doubt unshakable, but it cant withstand a person who wants to live.” Give
up all instincts that would allow them to thrive in reality, this institution
arrests the men who thrive in reality
iv. “’Like
a dog!’ –K”- the shame was to outlive him, people’s perspectives and influences
on an individual are more important than how an individual lives their lives.
No comments:
Post a Comment