Chapter 9 takes a shift with the way things have been going
during the novel for a while, however it keeps the main idea that K.’s trial is
going to shit. He has established to meet at the cathedral with an Italian
client to show him around the city, and yet again there are weird twists and
confusions planted by Kafka that perplex the reader in that “Kafkaesque” manner
that we should all be used to by now.
When K. is in the cathedral, he speaks to a priest who also
seems to know a lot about his case. The priest tells Joseph K. information that
he already knows; his case will not end well, though K. tries to convince him
that his relationships with the different women he has been with will help him
to succeed. Yet another small implication that in the screwed-up, corrupt
judicial system, connections are everything. Is this K.’s only hope at this
point? He seems to believe that these women are the only way he will win the
case. Through this wishful thinking, we
see that Kafka believes that the state institution is not a very consistent one,
nevertheless it holds complete power over all of us. Regardless of the fact
that the institution is corrupt, unjust, and unprofessional, it keeps a strong
power over the citizens and cannot be overcome. In this unfair world, the only
thing keeping people out of trouble is their connections.
The parable told by the priest is very symbolic to Joseph
K.’s situation. The man in the parable is knocking on the doors of the “law,”
and the institution fails to help him due to the manipulation and threats it
manifests over the people. K. is experiencing something similar; he is hopeless
before the law and cannot trust the state institution; an establishment that
claims that they exist to help the people and not weaken them. Kafka, through
this parable, demonstrates his cynical view of society and the state
institution, and shows the readers that the law is does not fulfill the support
and benefits that it claims. The law is weak and leaves the people impotent. Those
that are forced to deal with the law are left helpless, because they are bound
to fail. In a way, the man in the parable is Kafka’s way of summing up Joseph
K.’s situation and represents the way the law reacts to his case. Clearly,
Kafka has little or no faith in the controlling institutions that so strongly
affect society and the common man.
No comments:
Post a Comment