Camille Kelleher
Response to Vero
9/15/13
Vero discusses the unrealistic,
dreamy sequence of events in this story. It causes us to be indifferent to the
plot because we can never fully relate to K. and his feelings. I agree with Vero’s opinion on Kafka’s narrative
style, it is frustrating and sometimes causes me anxiety to get through the
assigned pages. Yet, this type of controlled and manipulated narrative is not
uncommon to us; Ayn Rand uses the same amount of control over the events in
Atlas Shrugged.
While reading both of these
stories, I feel contempt for how we have to follow the unnatural rollercoaster
of events that only help the authors reach their novel’s thesis. I hate having
to accept the story for how the author wants it to unfold, instead of how it
would actually happen in reality. It seems as if the author is cheating all
dimensions and logical sequences of the universe! But, I guess that is only the
definition of fiction. If I want to read a logical story, then I should read
autobiographies or history textbooks.
My distaste for these kinds of
narratives is so strong that I would choose unreliable narrators like Holden
Caulfield in The Catcher in the Rye over Rand and Kafka. Caulfield leaves the
readers wiggle room to question his narration instead of having to mindlessly
abide to unchangeable events. As for K.’s unrealistic trial, it looks like we
have to accept Kafka’s manipulation of plot and see what he has to say in the future of this story.
No comments:
Post a Comment